PQC Economics For the past three years, almost every serious discussion about Post-Quantum Cryptography has started with the same question: How much will it cost? Governments have published rough estimates. Boards want numbers. Vendors are selling calculators. Consultants are packaging migration roadmaps. But that question is still too narrow. It treats PQC like a software upgrade. It is not. The economics of PQC are not driven by cryptographic algorithms. They are driven by

One of the questions we're asked more than any other is: "What actually happens during a Discovery Sprint?" This carousel answers that question. Rather than talking about methodology, we've opened the lid on a real engagement for an anonymised digital challenger bank. You'll see how assumptions are tested, how evidence is gathered, why cryptographic inventories rarely reconcile, and how governance failures become visible long before any discussion about post-quantum algorithm

NIST CSF 2.0 may be one of the most important Quantum Readiness frameworks available today. Not because it contains a section on quantum computing. It doesn't. Not because it tells organisations which algorithms to deploy. It doesn't do that either. What CSF 2.0 does provide is something far more important. Governance. The 2024 update elevated governance to a core function, recognising that cybersecurity is no longer solely a technology challenge. It is a board, executive and

#Moody's may have delivered one of the most important post-quantum signals of 2026. Not because of a breakthrough in quantum computing. Not because of a new cryptographic standard. Because a global credit rating agency has started discussing Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) as a budgetary, governance and enterprise risk issue. For many years, this has been the position of SITG-Consulting. Our Quantum Risk White Paper, first published in 2024, revised in December 2025 and again

From "Dark Matter" Liability to Defensible Fiduciary Asset 1. Executive Summary: The Fiduciary Imperative In a $100T digital economy, cryptography is the invisible keel holding the ship of state and commerce upright. It secures identity, privacy, and value transfer. Yet 95% of enterprises operate with near-zero visibility into where this cryptography lives, how it behaves, or whether it remains fit for purpose (NIST). This hidden exposure has evolved into Cryptographic Dark M

Three post-quantum KEMs now sit inside one of the principal international standards for asymmetric encryption: ML-KEM, Classic McEliece and FrodoKEM. Read that again. Not one algorithm. Three. From three different mathematical families. Why this matters before the detail. A standards body had a choice. It could have ratified the market's preferred answer, ML-KEM, and closed the question. It did not. It standardised a structured lattice scheme, an unstructured lattice scheme a